●   Bản rời    

Đây là chỗ gian manh của Dự Thảo về Thuế của Đảng Cộng Hòa

Subject: ***_đây_là_chỗ_ gian_manh_của_dự
_thảo_thuế_Cộng_Hòa-Don_Trump_!!
From: Mike Wilson
Date: Fri, October 13, 2017 8:51 am

Chúng mày là ổ gian manh
ăn gian nói dối, tan tành đời dân

dân chủ đâu ? chỉ chia phần :
phần lời cho chủ, (phần) thiệt thòi cho dân

thằng gian tích đức đâu cần
miễn là tại vị, ăn phân được rồi !
dân chủ đâu nào - than ôi !
:(
Trạng Móc

Dự thảo thuế mới của Trump và bọn Cộng Hòa chỉ là một mớ điêu ngoa lừa bịp .
Mới đây, thằng Paul Ryan, phát ngôn Hạ viện, lại vừa bép xép:

"các bang lớn, đánh thuế nhiều, tiêu xài hoang phí như California, New York, New Jersey được các bang khác cả nước còng lưng nâng đỡ" (!)

Sự thật trái ngược hẳn :
Các bang đó nhận tài trợ liên bang ÍT HƠN số tiền thuế liên bang (federal tax) mà họ đóng cho nhà nước !!!
Thí dụ :
So với tài trợ liên bang cho New York mỗi năm nhân dân New York đóng thuế 50 tỉ đô hơn số tiền tài trợ liên bang mà họ nhận được vào ngân quĩ của bang .

Như vậy, chính nhân dân New York tài trợ các bang khác, chứ không phải là ngược lại - như Paul Ryan nói láo !

Bọn Cộng Hòa nói láo, vì mọi người đang thấy, chúng đòi giảm thuế rất đáng kể cho dân giàu, và để bù vào thiếu hụt thu thuế, chúng bắt dân thuờng đóng thêm thuế, bằng cách rút quyền "trừ hao" (deductions) các thuế mà họ đã đóng cho bang (state tax) và địa phương (city, county taxes) của họ .

Đây là chỗ bọn Cộng Hòa lấy thêm thuế của dân thuờng để đóng thay cho dân giàu mà chúng định giảm thêm thuế !

Một cách khác để thỏa hiệp với chúng, là, nếu không rút lại quyền "trừ hao" thuế bang (state tax), thì chúng rút lại quyền "trừ hao" tiền mua nhà trả góp :
như vậy, đàng nào dân cũng phải đóng thêm thuế !!!

Và cách này bắt buộc dân trong tất cả các bang phải đóng thuế thêm, dù họ có đóng thuế bang hay không .

Đây là cách "đểu cáng"
mà chính một số đại biểu Cộng Hòa cũng phản đối
- vì sợ mất ghế, mất chức do tội "không biết lo cho dân" !!!

nth-fl

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal_government/plan-to-scrap-state-and-local-tax-deduction-hits-resistance/2017/10/12/2a5aa7aa-af27-11e7-9b93-b97043e57a22_story.html?utm_term=.999326274121

Ryan blames high-tax states as GOP lawmakers balk on plan

By Ken Thomas and Marcy Gordon | AP By Ken Thomas and Marcy Gordon | AP

October 12 at 12:56 PM

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Paul Ryan on Thursday lambasted high-tax states like California, New York and New Jersey, arguing the rest of the country is “propping up profligate, big-government states” even as they pay billions more in taxes than they receive in return from the federal government.
Ryan’s attack came as he defended the Republican tax proposal that would repeal the federal deduction for state and local taxes, saying it has forced the rest of the country to support those states’ high taxes and reckless spending.
House Republicans from those states are bucking President Donald Trump’s tax overhaul package and GOP leadership over the popular tax deduction. The move to end the state-local deduction has angered GOP lawmakers and caused them to balk at supporting the nearly $6 trillion tax overhaul plan. The deduction is claimed by around 44 million people and costs the government an estimated $1.3 trillion in lost revenue over 10 years.
“States that got their act together are paying for states that didn’t,” Ryan said at an appearance at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He said the rest of the country is “propping up profligate, big-government states.”
The three states send far more in taxes to Washington than they get back in federal spending, new data show. Divided by total state residents, New York gets back 81 cents for every $1 it pays in, New Jersey receives 74 cents and California, 96 cents, according to an analysis released last month by the Rockefeller Institute of Government.
New York contributed $48 billion more in taxes to the federal government than it received in government spending, the biggest deficit, the analysis found.
New Jersey gave $31 billion more in taxes than it got back and California $17 billion more, the data show. The figures were for the budget year ending Sept. 30, 2015.
Opposition to ending the deduction has brought forward an unusual alliance of the Republican lawmakers from high-tax states, state and local government officials, public employee labor unions and business groups like Realtors. Wary of the financial pinch their constituents and members could sustain from losing the deduction, they are pressing the Trump administration to reconsider.
“This is really almost like a life or death issue for districts like mine,” says Republican Rep. Peter King, who represents a district on New York’s Long Island. “This cannot be called a rich district. It serves a lot of middle-income people.”
With Republicans splintered, the future of the $6 trillion tax overhaul plan is threatened by GOP defections, even as the success of the package is a political imperative for Republicans who have pinned their hopes on notching a big legislative achievement to help them retain control of Congress in next year’s elections.
Rep. Chris Collins, R-N.Y., a Trump ally, warned Wednesday that states such as New York, New Jersey, California and Illinois would need some “accommodations” to go along with eliminating the deduction for state and local taxes paid, possibly a cap on how much could be deducted.
Completely scrapping the deduction “would impact too many middle-income people,” Collins said.
“There will be a transfer of wealth of over a trillion dollars to the federal coffers,” said Matt Chase, executive director of the National Association of Counties.
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, said eliminating the deduction would not only “devastate funding for public schools, infrastructure, law enforcement and other vital services” but also boost taxes on the middle class. “For what? Tax cuts for the wealthy.”
The White House has argued that the plan is focused on helping middle-class workers, arguing that lowering corporate rates will boost jobs while the tax cuts and simpler tax code will reduce their burden.
Administration officials contend the rest of the nation shouldn’t have to subsidize states like California and New York that use the state and local tax deduction in large numbers.
But that argument has drawn a strong retort from the states.
“New Yorkers send over $50 billion more to the U.S. government than they receive back. So New Yorkers, and in particular Long Islanders, are subsidizing the rest of the country; not the other way around as you suggested,” wrote Kevin Law, president and CEO of the Long Island Association, in a letter to Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin.
A possible compromise floated by the state-local defenders cracked open another fault line: Homeowners would be forced to choose between two popular deductions — one for local property taxes under the state-local deduction, the other for mortgage interest.
___
Associated Press writers Frank Eltman in Massapequa Park, New York, and Kevin Freking in Washington contributed to this report.

---