Letter To Pope John Paul II
Nguyễn Mạnh Quang
http://sachhiem.net/NMQ/NMQ010a.php
đăng lại ngày 22 tháng 8, 2009
Xem bản Việt ngữ
Pope His Holiness
Apostolic Palace
00120 Vatican City, Italy
Telephone: 39-6-69-88-50-88
Date: September 19, 1999 (*)
HIS HOLINESS POPE JOHN PAUL II
VATICAN, ROME
Your Holiness,
Throughout the last decade, we were very
optimistic about several beautiful marks you have made in the
history of the Roman Catholic Church. In 1992 Your Holiness
publicly acknowledged that the Roman Catholic Church had been wrong
in the case of Galileo Galilei (1), and towards the end
of 1994 Your Holiness called on Catholics to adopt a penitential
stance before entering the third millenium (2). These
noble acts of contrition gave people all over the world great
delight and the belief that they were only initial steps in Your
Holiness’s entire scheme to investigate all the sins committed in
the name of Christ by the Church during the past two milleniums. We
were very much delighted by the fact that up to 1998 Your Holiness
had made a total of ninety-four official apologies to various
nations victimized by the Church (3). Furthermore, in
recent years Your Holiness and a number of Catholic leaders have
often advocated campaigning for democratic and human rights for the
poor peoples who are writhing under dictatorial powers. Even much
greater delight was brought about by Your Holiness’s July 1999
assertion that:
(i) Heaven is not an abstraction nor a
physical place amid the clouds, but a living personal relationship
with the Holy Trinity (4).
(ii) Hell is not a punishment imposed
extremely by God, but the condition resulting from attitudes and
actions which people adopt in this life (5).
On September 1st, 1999, Your
Holiness made a public apology “for all the misdeeds, injustices,
and violations of human rights committed by the Church in the past”
(6). And most recently, on Friday, December 17,
1999, when President Vaclav Havel of Czecho-slovakia visited Rome,
you apologized to the Czech people for the Church’s burning of
Father John Huss at the stake in 1415(7).
This has filled us with overwhelming exultation
and bolstered up our confidence in the Church’s serious willingness
to defend and fight for democratic and human rights of the
unfortunate people of countries that are still under oppressive
dictatorial rule. It has also convinced us that your sincere
repentance will impel the Church to take into account the untold
misery and suffering inflicted on the Vietnamese nation for over a
century as a consequence of the Church’s imperialist policies and
other sins.
Your Holiness, the wisdom of our ancestors lies
in the saying “Weeds cannot be effectively eradicated if they are
not thoroughly uprooted”. Your Holiness and the Church must have
realized that it was her imperialist policies and other concomitant
wrong doings that led to all the “historic sins committed by her
children” in victimized countries. Thus, mere apologies and
penitence, are not only futile but also utterly worthless. In order
to fight effectively for democratic and human rights for the
unfortunate peoples under authoritarian and dictatorial regimes, the
Church must, first and foremost, make herself an exemplary
democratic institution. This may be done by democratizing all her
political and governmental machinery, and straightforwardly and
unequivocally denounce her long-standing bellicose imperialist
policies. To these ends, the Church must initiate a thorough
revolution from the top echelons within the Vatican down to the
grass-roots units in remote villages or communes in the countryside.
Your Holiness,
In order to implement the above-mentioned
revolutionary undertakings, we solemnly propose that Your Holiness
(a) democratize all the organs of the Church’s government structure,
(b) abolish whatever is undemocratic, backward, feudal and outdated,
and (c) delegate the Church’s representatives to the victimized
countries to negotiate compensation and seek forgiveness. The
following is a number of proposals in detail that we respectfully
beseech Your Holiness to consider and to implement as soon as
possible for the sake of the Church’s prestige.
I. APROPOS OF THE
PAPACY AND THE RULING MACHINERY
l. For the democratization of all governing
bodies of the Vatican, elections need to be organized to select
people for the office of Cardinal, Archbishop, and Bishop, each for
a term of office that is restricted to a number of years. If
necessary, a term limit should be imposed on people holding these
offices.
2. Abrogate all rituals that are inappropriate
to a free and democratic society, for example, the rituals of kings
kissing Cardinals’ feet, believers kissing missionaries’ shoes or
sandals and bishops’ rings.
3. Desist using language and terms that smack
of haughtiness, deception, contempt, insolence, self-righteousness,
e.g. “cong giao” (public religion), “ta giao” (evil religion), “di
giao” (heresy), “tro lai dao” (“returned to the Church” for
converteds), “Chua chon” (chosen by God), “lam sang danh Chua”
(glorify God/Christ’s name) for those who support the Church, “chong
Chua” (anti-Chirst) for those who are considered as against the
Church, etc., and feudal-sounding forms of address that degrade
Christian believers. Whatever position and office one holds, one has
no right to assume the position of and call themselves “cha”
(father), and address believers as “con” (Child/Children).
II. APROPOS OF
POLITICAL POLICIES
AND AMORAL STRATEGIES FOR
THE DISSEMINATION OF CHRITIANITY
1. Solemnly decree the immediate abolition
of the “Church powers above State powers” doctrine.
2. Solemnly decree the immediate
abrogation of the political doctrine based on St. Thomas Aquinas’s
(1225-1274) theological power theory, which claimed that rulers are
chosen by God and, therefore, they are not supposed to be toppled by
the people’s revolutionary uprisings even though they are corrupt
and tyrannical.
3. Publicly condemn the Church’s decrees
of 1449 (which ordained the use of armed forces to invade
non-Christian territories and force the conquered peoples to convert
to Christianity), 1452 (which allowed the Church’s henchmen to
enslave the conquered nations), and 1493 (which divided the world
into two parts, one of which was then granted to Spain, the other to
Portugal). Issue a decree abrogating all the said decrees and
assuming responsibilities for all the consequences brought about by
them to the victims.
4. Issue a decree unequivocally condemning
Pope Pius VII’s message of April 29, 1814 to the Bishop of Troyes,
and condemming Pope Gregory XVI’s (1830 – 1846) proclamation - that
“freedom of press is the most detrimental, terrible and
disgusting…”, and solemnly pledging to honor freedom of thought,
freedom of religion, freedom of press, etc. as do all democratic
states in North America and Western Europe.
5. Solemnly decree the repeal of the
Church law whereby non-Christian people are required to go through
absolution rituals (e.g., to be baptized), prior to marrying their
Christian lovers.
III. APROPOS OF WHAT THE CHURCH
HAS DONE TO THE VIETNAMESE NATION
1. Publish an official document solemnly
acknowledging that the Church was wrong when embarking on acts that
violated the national security and sovereignty of Vietnam ever since
the first half of the 16th century. These wrong doings
consisted of:
a). Espionage activities through which
strategic intelligence information was collected and sent back to
the Vatican and the French colonialists (8)
b). Enticement of paupers, gangsters, and
dissidents into converting to Catholicism, in fact for the purpose
of recruiting them into rings of resident spies, who later provided
inside support to the Vatican-French allied expeditionary forces
when they came to invade Vietnam,
c). Dispatch to Vietnam of professional spies
under the guise of missionaries to organize and run espionage
activities. These spies later returned to Europe and even went to
Paris in order to campaign for French troops to be sent to invade
Vietnam. This campaign consisted of:
i. Alexandre de Rhodes, a priest who
campaigned with King Louis XIV in Paris in the 1650’s,
ii. Pigneau de Behaine, a bishop who took
Prince Canh, aged 4, to Paris in the mid-1780’s for
a campaign with King Louis XVI for
reinforcements to help Nguyen Anh fight Tay Son,
iii. Pellerin, a bishop, Legrand de Liraye,
a priest, and Huc, a priest, who came to Paris in the 1850’s to
persuade Queen Eugenie and Napoleon III to send troops to invade
Vietnam,
iv. Urging and aiding Bishop Pigneau de
Behaine in his blatant interference in Vietnam’s internal affairs,
particularly the procurement of French military aid to help Nguyen
Anh in his fight for the throne against Tay Son, paving the way for
the subsequent invasion of Vietnam by the French,
v. Complicity with the French in scheming
for the re-establishment of French occupation and colonization of
Vietnam by appointing Thierry d’Argenlieu, a Catholic priest, High
Commissioner/Governor of Indochina in August 1945 for the purpose of
seeking inside support and collaboration from the Vietnamese
Catholics.
vi. Complicity with French General De
Lattre de Tassigny in instructing the Council of Bishops of
Indochina. This council consisted of 14 Archbishops and Bishops:
John Dooley (chairman), Jean Baptiste Chabatier (of Pnom Penh), Ngo
Dinh Thuc (of Vinh Long), Jean Cassigne (Sanh, of Saigon), Marcel
Piquet (Loi, of Qui Nhon), Jean Marie Maze (Kim, of Hung Hoa),
Anselme Tadde Tu (i.e. Le Huu Tu, of Phat Diem), Pierre Marie Chi
(i.e. Pham Ngoc Chi, of Bui Chu), Jean Baptiste Urrita (Thi, of
Hue), Dominique Hoang van Doan (of Bac Ninh), Joseph Marie Trinh Nhu
Khue (of Hanoi), Fr. Felice Perez (Hien, of Hai Phong), Fr. Bernard
Illomera (Yen, of Thai Binh), Paul Renaud (Ai, of Kontum). It was
held from Nov. 5 to Nov. 10, 1951 to agree on and issue a statement
ordering all the Catholics in Indochina to oppose the Viet Minh
Front-led Resistance against the imperialist-colonialist
Vatican-French Alliance.
2. Issue an official statement
unequivocally condemning the following works:
a. “Day Four” chapter (on the Church’s
teachings) of the work “Catechism in Eight Days” (because of its
libelous and defamatory content against the gods of the traditional
Vietnamese religious beliefs),
b. The biblical book “The Daily Lessons
from the Bible” published by the Saigon diocese in 1971 and endorsed
by Archbishop Nguyen van Binh on March 19, 1971. This book refers
the Vietnamese people as “the barbarians”. This book contains
several extremely uncivilized and belligerent language, such as
“completely destroy the religion of the Buddha god” (pha tan dao but
than). We implore Your Holiness to ban the two books.
3. Issue an official statement
acknowledging the Church’s fault in inducing Vietnamese Catholics
“not to acknowledge the power and law of the Vietnam State”, and in
teaching them that “the Pope in Rome is their only and supreme king”
and therefore “they have to subject themselves to the Vatican only”
(9). Such teachings effectively destabilized the then
Vietnam society, thus enabling the Vatican-French Alliance to ‘fish
in the troubled waters’ - to conquer Vietnam easily and establish
colonial rule.
4. Issue an official statement solemnly
acknowledging two serious mistakes committed by the Church under
Pope Pius XII’s (1939-1958). One was in asking the American
government to help rescue Vatican-French allied troops under siege
at the Dien Bien Phu fortified outpost since early 1954 by using
atomic bombs to break the siege (fortunately, the American
government refused). The other was in campaigning with the American
government for assistance in putting Ngo Dinh Diem into power in the
Republic of (South) Vietnam, who served as an instrument for the
Vatican to carry on her scheme to Catholicize South Vietnam.
5. Issue an official statement solemnly
acknowledging that during the 1862 - April 30, 1975 period the
Church has collected an enormous amount of wealth from the
Vietnamese nation, as presented in the book “Thuc Chat cua Giao Hoi
La Ma” (The True Nature of The Roman Catholic Church).
6. Issue an official statement solemnly
asking the Vietnamese people pardon for the above-mentioned sins,
and acknowledging that those wrong doings have plunged them in
incessant, catastrophic misery and suffering, whose long-lasting
effects have lingered on to-date like deep and painful wounds
impossible to heal.
7. Issue an official statement repealing
the Church’s 6-19-1988 decree, which sanctified 117 Vietnamese and
European persons, and acknowledging that the sanctification of these
people was a grave mistake. We beg Your Holiness to affirm that
these fanatic criminals were so stupefied that they committed high
crimes against their fatherland. Thus, the withdrawal of the decree
will appease the anger of the majority of the Vietnamese people at
the Church.
8. Set up a commission to consider and
negotiate with the Vietnamese government the return of all
properties (including cultural and religious institutions) and the
compensation for the damage caused by all the Church’s activities in
Vietnam since the first missionary sent to Vietnam in 1533. To
guarantee impartiality, this commission should be constituted of
progressive intellectuals, who are knowledgeable about Vietnam
affairs but not closely associated with the pre-1954 colonial rule
and the Ngo Dinh Diem regime. The study of this committee should
also include a compensation of the property and money taken away by
the French missionaries and the Diem government (Eighteen billion
dollars, mentioned in the book “Our Own Worst Enemy” by William J.
Lederer, New York, W.W. Norton & Company, 1968, p. 165).
Your Holiness,
There have been fanatical Vietnamese
Catholics who hold that “Even if in fact there were wrongs done to
the Vietnamese people, they were only the work of individual
Catholics or Catholic missionaries, not the Church. And as the
Church had nothing to do with those wrongs, there is no need for her
to apologize to anybody.” We believe that Your Holiness are keenly
aware of the Church history, and that, more than anybody else, Your
Holiness are aware of Your Holiness’s as well as the Church’s
responsibility for the catastrophic sufferings inflicted on
victimized countries by “her children”. It must have been very clear
to Your Holiness that all the wrong doings, even though committed by
fanatical, over-zealous Catholics, are as much the Church’s as Your
Holiness’s own responsibilities because they were perpetrated along
the line of the Vatican’s 1449 and 1452 directives and decrees. As a
result, Your Holiness have resolutely and courageously admitted to
the Church’s past misdeeds and publicly apologized to the victims
regardless of possible impediment and objection from the
conservative camp within the Vatican. It is common knowledge that
the problem with fanatical fundamentalists, is that they are unable
to understand thoroughly the history and past deeds of their
Church.. Under these circumstances, how can fanatical Christian
fundamentalists grasp the lofty significance of Your Holiness’s
repeated acknowledgements of the Church’s past misdeeds and
apologies to the victims?
Your Holiness,
Your Holiness have courageously overcome
innumerable difficulties and obstacles, particularly Your Holiness’s
own pride, to acknowledge the Church past wrongs and apologize to
the victims. Your Holiness have done what your predecessors were
unable to do. No wonder Your Holiness have been acclaimed as the
greatest Pope in the Church history. Unfortunately, in reality what
Your Holiness have accomplished so far have been “mere utterances”.
We believe in the saying “Actions speak louder than words” and trust
that Your Holiness do, too. The countries that were victimized by
the Church have been looking forward to concrete actions from Your
Holiness and the Church to alleviate the victims’ resentment and
animosity against her. Without the follow-up actions, people of the
world cannot help doubting the Church and the following questions
will inevitably be raised:
1. How can the Church fight for freedom
and democracy for people of the world while the Vatican adopts a
absolute sacerdotal monarchy with rituals that smack of feudalism,
and use forms of address and language that are extremely
impertinent, uncivilized and degrading?
2. How can the Church fight for human
rights or ask that human rights be honored while it is the Church
that violates the human rights of those belonging to other
religions? This is evidenced by the fact that the Church forces
non-Christian people to renounce their own religion and be converted
to Catholicism before they can get married to their Christian
lovers.
3. How can the Church honor freedom of
thought and freedom of the press while the Church has not publicly
and solemnly denounced Pope Gregory XVI’s (1831-1846) condemnation
of freedom of the press as “the most detrimental and disgusting”?
4. How can the Church honor freedom of
religion when she still condones the use “The Catechism in Eight
Days” of Alexander de Rhode’s book, and the “The Daily Lessons from
the Bible” by Saigon diocese as mentioned above?
5. How can the Church fight for justice
for all when she still maintains a high-handed attitude and refuses
to negotiate with the authorities of countries victimized by the
Church (among which, Vietnam) to reach an agreement on compensations
for the damage done?
Your Holiness,
A proverb has taught us that a single instance
of failure to keep his words is enough to cause a person to lose his
entire creditability. Our experience with Mr. Ngo Dinh Diem, a
protégé of the Church, has rendered us very sensitive to and wary of
words. As President of the Republic of Vietnam, Mr. Ngo Dinh Diem
has gone back on his words and betrayed Emperor Bao Dai, his
American supporters, his old friends, the Buddhists, the opposition,
and the people of South Vietnam as many as 13 times. Furthermore, as
Your Holiness must be well aware of, in the past the Church
delegated missionaries to Africa, America and Asia to claim freedom
of religion and the right to disseminate Christianity. In the
meanwhile, the Church outlawed this freedom in areas under her
control in Western and Southern Europe. As a result, the Church
became notorious with her Inquisition sending over 11 million
followers of other religion to their death.
Your Holiness,
“Repentance must accompany Penance”. We
sincerely and urgently beg Your Holiness to consider the above
aspirations and materialize your honest repentances by actions to
relieve the anger and hatred nurtured by the people of the countries
victimized by the Church through her past wrongs that Your Holiness
have acknowledged and apologized for. This type os actions will
prevent people’s remittance of former President Nguyen van Thieu’s
statement: “Don’t believe what they say, watch carefully what they
do instead”. Only by such actions can the Church save her prestige.
May God bless you.
Respectfully yours,
Nguyen Manh Quang
A person from one of the nations victimized by
the Roman Catholic Church
7205 N. 25th Street
Tacoma, WA. 98406
U.S.A.
CC: All Nations and World Agencies.
NOTES
(1) “Giao Hoi Cong Giao Da Nhin Nhan Sai Lam
Trong Vu An Galileo”. Chinh Nghia Weekly, No. 146, Nov. 7, 1992.
(2) Paula Butturini, “Pope Wants Catholic
Church To Confess Its Sins”. Houston Chronicle, Tuesday, Nov. 15,
1994.
(3) Chu Van Trinh & Tuong Minh, “Roi Mat Na”
(Fallen Mask ). Tavares, Florida: Ban Tu Thu Tu Luc, 1998, back
cover page.
(4) Hoc Hoi Giesu Kito Phuc Sinh. Tuyen Cao
8, Article 1, page 2. Và link bài báo tiếng Anh http://www.ncregister.com/... a_place_says_pope
(5) Jude Webber. “No Fire or Brimstone, But
Hell’s Real, Pope Says.” Houston Chronicle, July 29, 1999, p. 26A.
(6) “Duc Giao Hoang Jean-Paul II: Giao Hoi
Cong Giao Se xin Loi ve Qua Khu”. Nguoi Viet Tay Bac, No. 807, Sept.
7, 1999.
(7) “Pope John Paul II apologized…” The News
Tribune (Tacoma), Saturday, December 18, 1999. This is an excerpt
from the article: “Pope John Paul II apologized Friday for the
“cruel” execution of Jan Hus, a Czech religious reformer who was
burned at the stake in 1415. The apology was timed for the visit
from the Czech president, Vaclav Havel, who donated the Christmas
tree outside St. Peter’s that is to be lighted today.”
(8) Avro Manhattan, “Vietnam, Why Did We Go?”
Chino, CA: Chick Publication, 1984, p. 139.
(9) Nguyen Xuan Tho, “Buoc Mo Dau Cua Su
Thiet Lap He Thong Thuoc Dia Phap O Vietnam (1858-1897). Published
by the author, 1995, p. 17.
(*) January 10, 2000: Translated from
Vietnamese version and updated the latest apology of the Pope.
Xem bản Việt ngữ
Những lá thư ngỏ
Gửi Quý vị Tu sĩ Ca-tô và giáo dân người Việt (Nguyễn Mạnh Quang)
Letter To Pope John Paul II (Nguyễn Mạnh Quang)
Thư Cám Ơn (Charlie Nguyễn)
Thư KMTD - Hiền tài hay Việt gian ? (Nguyễn Mạnh Quang)
Thư Ngỏ gửi Cám Ơn TGM (Trần Chung Ngọc)
Thư Ngỏ Gửi Giáo Hoàng John Paul II (Nguyễn Mạnh Quang)
Thư Ngỏ Gửi TGM Ngô Quang Kiệt (Nguyễn Mạnh Quang)
Thư Thắc Mắc của HS KMTD (Nguyễn Mạnh Quang)
Trang Tôn Giáo